Become a Member  |  Donate   |  Renew  |  Shop for Activist Wares  |  Join Our Mailing List
Action Alert

Protect our farms from new

Animal ID regulations

Small farmers and urban poultry owners alike are threatened by the USDA's new proposal for animal identification. The agency has proposed a rule that imposes costs and paperwork burdens on farmers, ranchers, backyard poultry owners, sale barns, vets, and state agencies in order to track animals that cross state lines.

The proposed rule is a solution in search of a problem. The USDA has failed to identify the specific problem or disease of concern, and the real focus of the program is helping the export market for the benefit of a handful of large corporations. The agency has also failed to account for the full cost to both private individuals and state governments, creating an unfunded mandate. The new rule will harm rural businesses while wasting taxpayer dollars that could be better spent on the real problems we face in controlling animal disease, food security, and food safety.

 

Family farmers and ranchers cannot afford additional paperwork and unnecessary expenses. Please help protect our farms and our right to own animals by submitting your comments today!

ACTION TO TAKE 

You can submit comments either online or by mail.

ONLINE: www.regulations.gov/#!submitComment;D=APHIS-2009-0091-0001   

 

The government's online system can be difficult to navigate and there is a time limit. TIPS: We encourage you to write your comments and save them in a document on your computer, then copy and paste them into the online comment form. Also, although only some of the information fields are marked as being "required," some people have experienced problems when they left fields blank. So for the fields that are not required, you may wish to put "NA" (not applicable) in them to avoid potential problems.

 

BY MAIL: Docket No.APHIS-2009-0091, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238

 

DEADLINE: Friday, December 9, 2011

 

Please also send a copy of your comments to your U.S. Representative and Senators. If you don't know who represents you, you can find out at www.house.gov and  www.senate.gov  

 

Below are talking points you can use for your comments, followed by sample comments and more detailed information.

TALKING POINTS

1) The agency should withdraw the proposed rule. If the export market would benefit from the proposed rule, as the agency claims, then the agribusinesses that export meat should pay the costs and offer economic premiums to livestock producers to encourage them to participate in a voluntary system.

 

2) The agency needs to identify the specific diseases of concern and analyze how to best address those diseases - including prevention measures -- rather than continuing to push a one-size-fits-all tracking program.

 

3) Significant problems with the proposed regulation include:

  • Imposition of new requirements for identifying chickens and other poultry. Small farmers and backyard poultry owners should not be burdened with identifying and tracking birds, and the agency has not shown any need to impose these new requirements.
  • Applying the new identification requirements to feeder cattle.
  • Applying the requirements to direct-to-slaughter cattle, including both for custom and for retail sales.
  • Not recognizing brands and tattoos as official forms of identification.
SAMPLE COMMENTS

Please personalize these sample comments rather than doing a form letter. The personalization can be just a few sentences at the beginning of the comments, but it does make a significant difference. And if you have time to write more detailed comments, that's even better!

 

Dear Secretary Vilsack:

 

I am a __________________ (farmer, local foods consumer, backyard poultry owner, horse owner, etc.).   I am very concerned that the proposed rule will __________ (not be workable for my farm; impose costs on my farmers that will then be passed on to me; make it prohibitively expensive for me to order baby chicks from out-of-state hatcheries; etc.)

 

I urge the USDA to withdraw the proposed rule. If the export market would benefit from the proposed rule, as the agency claims, then the meat packing companies that export meat should pay the costs and offer economic premiums to livestock producers to encourage them to participate in a voluntary system. For disease control, the agency needs to focus on preventative measures rather than after-the-fact tracking.

 

There are significant problems with the proposed rule:

  • The imposition of new requirements for identifying chickens and other poultry. Small farmers and backyard poultry owners should not be burdened with identifying and tracking birds, and the agency has not shown any need to impose these new requirements.
  • Applying the new identification requirements to feeder cattle.
  • Applying the requirements to direct-to-slaughter cattle, both for custom and for retail sales.
  • Not recognizing brands and tattoos as official forms of identification.

Sincerely,

Name

Address

City, State Zip

 MORE INFORMATION

The program is fundamentally flawed because it is not designed to address the real problems we face, and it imposes burdens on producers for the benefit of Big Agribusiness' export markets.  

 

We have asked USDA for data showing where the problems are in tracking animals currently. Rather than provide that data, USDA hand-picked a few anecdotes, out of the millions of animals in this country. But the agency's unsupported claims do not justify imposing broad new tracking requirements. Small farms are not the source of most disease problems in this country, yet the proposed rule will burden them unfairly.

 

POULTRY: Small-scale, pastured, and backyard poultry will be particularly hard hit by the proposed rule. While the large confinement operations will be able to use "group identification," the definition of the term does not cover most independent operations. Since thousands of people order baby chicks from hatcheries in other states, these birds cross state lines the first day of their lives. Even if the farmer or backyard owner never takes the bird across state lines again, they will have to use individually sealed and numbered leg bands on each chicken, turkey, goose, or duck to comply with the language of the proposed rule.

 

Even if the definition of "group identification" were changed to cover small operations, the result would be new paperwork requirements on almost every person who owns chickens, turkeys, or other poultry. The agency has entirely failed to justify imposing these burdens on poultry owners.

 

CATTLE: Along with new identification requirements imposed on all breeding-age cattle, the proposed rule would require identification and paperwork on calves and young cattle ("feeder cattle"), even though there's no evidence that such requirements will help disease control. In addition, veterinarians and sale barns will have to keep records for 5 years, even though many of these cattle will have been consumed years earlier, creating mountains of useless paperwork.

 

Producers will only be able to use brands or tattoos as identification if their States enter into special agreements. State agencies will have to build extensive database systems to handle all of the data, creating problems for States' budgets.

 

HORSES: The proposed rule also requires that horse owners identify their animals before crossing state lines. Although most, if not all, horses that are shipped across state lines are already identified in some fashion, the proposed rule creates a new complication: whether or not a physical description is sufficient identification will be determined by the health officials in the receiving state, leaving vets and horse owners struggling with significant uncertainty as they have to anticipate what will be allowed.

 

SHEEP, GOATS, and HOGS: The draft rule also covers sheep, goats, and hogs that cross state lines, essentially federalizing the existing programs which have been adopted state-by-state until now.

 

You can read the proposed rule at www.aphis.usda.gov/traceability/downloads/2011/Proposed Rule.pdf

 

FOR MORE INFORMATION, go to  www.farmandranchfreedom.org/Animal-ID-2011

About the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund:

FTCLDF is a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization made up of farmers and consumers joining together and pooling resources to protect the constitutional rights of the nation's family farms and the consumers who patronize them. Annual membership is $125 for Farmers and $50 for Consumers.   

 Join FTCLDF Now!  

Visit www.farmtoconsumer.org or call 703-208-3276   

 

Quarterly and monthly membership payment plans are available. Buyers clubs, CSAs, farmers markets, etc. can join as Affiliates for as low as $5 per member; ask for details. 

Donations to the Fund are not tax-deductible. 

cow with eartag
Proposed Regulations to be applied to:
  • Poultry
  • Cattle
  • Horses
  • Sheep
  • Goats
  • Hogs
Submit Comments
Deadline:  Dec. 9, 2011

See "Tips" for submitting Comments Online

OR  mail comments (see address under "Take Action")

Be sure to send a copy of your comments to your Representative and Senators.
More Info
Read Proposed Rule

More Info on Animal ID


















Bookmark & Share
 this alert with your social media by clicking any of these icons at top of this email:
Share button for social media