Become a Member  |  Donate   |  Renew  |  Shop for Activist Wares  |  Join Our Mailing List
Action Alert

Protect Family Farms & Ranches  

Call Your U.S. Rep. to Eliminate Funding for New Burdensome Animal ID Regulation

Please keep up the calls to your Representative to stop the looming animal ID rule! The Appropriations Committee is expected to take up the Agricultural Appropriations bill this Tuesday, June 19, so there's no time to waste.

 

The USDA is on track to issue a final rule on Animal ID this summer and has not indicated that any major changes have been made from the version it proposed last year. That rule as proposed by USDA would subject cattle and poultry owners across the country to new tagging and paperwork requirements that could collectively cost millions of dollars, yet the agency has designated the final rule as "not economically significant."

 

This animal ID rule is a solution in search of a problem. The USDA has failed to identify the specific problem or disease of concern. Instead, the real focus of the program is helping the export market for the benefit of a handful of large corporations.

 

The agency has also failed to account for the true cost to private individuals, businesses, and state and federal agencies, creating an unfunded mandate. The new rule will harm rural businesses while wasting taxpayer dollars that could be better spent on the real problems we face in controlling animal disease, food security, and food safety.

 

Please help protect our farms and our right to own animals by contacting your Representative today!


ACTION TO TAKE 

Call your U.S. Representative and ask him or her to work to stop funding for the Animal ID rule until and unless the agency addresses the full costs of the proposal.

 

If you don't know who represents you, you can call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 or find out online at www.house.gov 

 

SAMPLE MESSAGE:

 

Hi, my name is ____ and I am a constituent from (state). I urge Congressman ____ to work to eliminate funding for the USDA's Animal Traceability rule. The agency has told the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that the rule is not "economically significant," but that is simply not true. The rule as proposed by USDA would impose significant costs on independent ranchers, family farmers, backyard poultry owners and livestock businesses.

 

In a time of economic hardship, it makes no sense to spend our tax dollars on this program when USDA hasn't even properly evaluated the costs or identified specific, concrete benefits. Please work to eliminate the funding for this unnecessary and burdensome program in the Agricultural Appropriations bill.

MORE INFORMATION

Although we don't know for certain what is in the final rule that USDA has sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for final approval, we do know several things:

 

1)      The proposed rule had many problems (discussed more below).

 

2)      The USDA has not announced that it has made any major changes to the proposed rule. In fact, in informal statements, the USDA has indicated that the costly provisions for tagging feeder cattle are part of the final rule.

 

3)      The USDA has told OMB that the rule is "not economically significant," putting it on the fast track for final approval without any serious evaluation of the true costs that it will impose.

FACTS ABOUT THE PROPOSED RULE

We have repeatedly asked USDA for data showing where the problems are in tracking animals currently. Rather than provide that data, USDA hand-picked a few anecdotes, out of the millions of animals in this country. But the agency's unsupported claims do not justify imposing broad new tracking requirements. Small farms are not the source of most disease problems in this country, yet the proposed rule will burden them unfairly.

 A

POULTRY: Small-scale, pastured, and backyard poultry would be particularly hard hit by the proposed rule. While the large confinement operations will be able to use "group identification," the definition of the term does not cover most independent operations. Since thousands of people order baby chicks from hatcheries in other states, these birds cross state lines the first day of their lives. Even if the farmer or backyard owner never takes the bird across state lines again, they will have to use individually sealed and numbered leg bands on each chicken, turkey, goose, or duck to comply with the language of the proposed rule.

 

Even if the definition of "group identification" were changed to cover small operations, the result would be new paperwork requirements on almost every person who owns chickens, turkeys, or other poultry. The agency has entirely failed to justify imposing these burdens on poultry owners.

 B

CATTLE: Along with new identification requirements imposed on all breeding-age cattle, the proposed rule would require identification and paperwork on calves and young cattle ("feeder cattle"), even though there's no evidence that such requirements will help disease control. In addition, veterinarians and sale barns will have to keep records for 5 years, even though many of these cattle will have been consumed years earlier, creating mountains of useless paperwork.

 

Producers will only be able to use brands or tattoos as identification if their States enter into special agreements. State agencies will have to build extensive database systems to handle all of the data, creating problems for States' budgets.

 C

HORSES: The proposed rule also requires that horse owners identify their animals before crossing state lines. Although most, if not all, horses that are shipped across state lines are already identified in some fashion, the proposed rule creates a new complication: whether or not a physical description is sufficient identification will be determined by the health officials in the receiving state, leaving vets and horse owners struggling with significant uncertainty as they have to anticipate what will be allowed.

 D

SHEEP, GOATS, and HOGS: The proposed rule also covers sheep, goats, and hogs that cross state lines, essentially federalizing the existing programs which have been adopted state-by-state until now.

 

You can read the proposed rule at www.aphis.usda.gov/traceability/downloads/2011/Proposed%20Rule.pdf

 

FOR MORE INFORMATION, go to  www.farmandranchfreedom.org/Animal-ID-2011

About the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund:

FTCLDF is a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization made up of farmers and consumers joining together and pooling resources to protect the constitutional rights of the nation's family farms and the consumers who patronize them. Annual membership is $125 for Farmers and Artisan Food Producers and $50 for Consumers.   

 Join FTCLDF Now!  

Visit www.farmtoconsumer.org or call 703-208-3276   

 

Quarterly and monthly membership payment plans are available. Buyers clubs, CSAs, farmers markets, etc. can join as Affiliate Communities for as low as $250/year plus $5 for each associated member above the first 50; ask for details. 

Donations to the Fund are not tax-deductible. Ask about options to make tax-deductible donations.   

cow with eartag
Ask Your U.S. Rep to Stop Funding for Animal ID

Proposed Regulations to be applied to:

Committee Hearing Scheduled June 19

More Info
Read Proposed Rule

More Info on Animal ID

Read  Action Alert on Proposed Rule

















Bookmark & Share
 this alert with your social media by clicking any of these icons at top of this email:
Share button for social media

Green