Become a Member  |  Donate  |  Renew  |  Shop for Activist Wares  |  Join Our Mailing List
Keep Small Farmers and Food Producers in Business!
Act Now on FDA's 2014 Proposed Food Safety Regulations!

 

Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)
Speak up now for
small farmers and producers! 


Find Out More about FSMA!



 

The FDA's re-proposed Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) rules will have a disastrous impact on small, sustainable farms and food businesses if they are approved as written. Many producers will have to raise prices or could be driven out of business, reducing consumer access to local, nutrient-dense foods.

 

Thousands of people across the country fought hard for the Tester-Hagan amendment to exempt small-scale, direct-marketing farms and artisan food producers from the most burdensome aspects of FSMA. This exemption is essential to the continued vitality of the local foods movement. But the FDA's proposed rules don't implement it fairly!

 

Congress gave the agency the power to revoke the Tester-Hagan exemption on a case-by-case basis. This was intended to be a protective measure to address specific food safety threats by individual producers. But the agency's proposed rules give local bureaucrats excessive power to target individual small farms and food producers and, in practical terms, drive them out of business without due process.

 

There are also numerous problems with the substance of the proposed rulesMany good farmers and food producers will be subject to the proposed rules despite the Tester-Hagan exemption, and we need rules that work for these medium-sized producers who provide healthy food for so many people.

 

Take Action Now! See the below step-by-step instructions on how you can help. If you have just a few minutes, do just one action item. Or do them all, to have even more of an impact!


Please share this alert with your friends, neighbors, and customers! 

Ask them to support a healthy local food system by adding their voices to this effort.

Item1
TAKE ACTION #1     
Sign the Letter to Protect the Exemption for Small-Scale, Direct-Marketing Producers!

 

The Tester-Hagan exemption provides vital protection for small-scale, direct-marketing producers from some of the most onerous provisions of the new law. But FDA is not implementing it fairly! 

 

Will you add your voice to the joint letter telling the agency to respect the letter and intent of the law?

 

You can sign on as an individual consumer, farmer, or food business. Or, if you are authorized to speak for a nonprofit, you can sign on your organization. 

 

Sign on at www.bit.ly/sign-the-tester-hagan-letter

 

The deadline for sign-ons is Friday, December 12.

Item2TAKE ACTION #2-A     

Comment on the Other Provisions of the Proposed Rules*

 

After you sign on to the joint letter (see above action item), please take a few more minutes and submit individual comments to FDA about the substantive issues with the proposed rules.

 

The deadline for submitting comments to FDA is Monday, December 15.

 

Below is a sample letter for consumers and concerned citizens to use, with recommendations to FDA to fix the top six problems with the proposed rules. You can copy and paste the letter into your own document, but please take a moment to personalize your comments to make your letter more effective!

 

*If you're a farmer/food producer, you can also use the sample letter below--or check out the more detailed letter and information in TAKE ACTION #2-B, to better protect your farm or business. The longer letter in #2-B includes more issues and more details.

 

NOTE: Submit your comment in TWO places: on the Produce Safety Rule for farms and on the HARPC Rule for facilities. This is important because many of these issues affect both rules.

 

a) Produce Rule: www.bit.ly/produce-rule

b) HARPC Rule: www.bit.ly/facilities-rule

 

Instructions for submitting comments online:

  • Using the sample letter below, write your comment on your computer and save it as an electronic file. 
  • In the comment box, type "see attached," and then upload the file with your comments.
  • Uncheck the box that says "I am submitting on behalf of a third party," so that you do not have to enter an organization name.
  • For category, select "individual consumer" or "private industry."
  • Click "continue."
  • Check the box that you have read and understood the statement, and be sure to click "submit comment." You should be taken to a new screen with a confirmation number.
Item3TAKE ACTION #2-B - for Farmers & Food Businesses     

Expand Your Comments & Learn More About What These Rules Could Mean For You

 

If you are a farmer or food business who may be impacted by the proposed rules, we have a longer letter and background document that covers more issues. You can significantly increase your impact by expanding your comments to show your farm or business would be affected.

 

Background information to help you learn more and an expanded sample letter are both posted at: www.bit.ly/ftcldf-fsma

 

The deadline for submitting comments to FDA is Monday, December 15.

 

Instructions for submitting comments online:

  • Using the sample letter below, write your comment on your computer & save it as an electronic file. 
  • In the comment box, type "see attached," and then upload the file with your comments.
  • Uncheck the box that says "I am submitting on behalf of a third party," so that you do not have to enter an organization name.
  • For category, select "individual consumer" or "private industry."
  • Click "continue."
  • Check the box that you have read and understood the statement, and be sure to click "submit comment." You should be taken to a new screen with a confirmation number.
Item4SAMPLE LETTER  

 

Please personalize your message--it will make a much bigger impact.

 

Re: Preventive Controls Rule: FDA-2011-N-0920, Produce Standards Rule: FDA-2011-N-0921

 

I am a ____ [consumer, farmer, food business...].

 

[Personalize your comment with a couple of sentences: Do you buy direct from farmers? Are you involved in a food co-op or CSA, etc? Are you a farmer or a food business? Add a sentence or two to explain why this issue is important to you.]

 

I am writing because I am concerned about the impact that FDA's re-proposed FSMA rules will have on [my farm/business, other farmers in my community, the farms that I buy food from, etc.]. The large-scale, industrialized food system, with its national or even multinational sourcing and distribution chains, carries the greatest risk for foodborne illness outbreaks. The agency should focus its limited resources on these sources of risk, rather than burdening small-scale farms and food businesses with unnecessary costs or ambiguous and vague requirements.

 

I am specifically concerned about the issues discussed below.

 

1. Qualified Exemptions under the Tester-Hagan amendment: FDA should implement the Tester-Hagan provisions in a manner that doesn't risk pushing a small-scale producer out of business with a too-hasty or erroneous decision to revoke their exemption and too-short deadlines for compliance. Specifically, before the agency revokes a producer's exemption, the regulations should provide for normal due process protections, such as a specific statement of the reasons in the notice of revocation, a reasonable period of time (at least 90 days) for the producer to respond, and a required hearing.

 

The agency should also provide at least a year for any small or very small producer whose exemption is revoked to come into compliance with the FSMA regulations. Requiring these small and micro-businesses to comply in a shorter time period than large scale Ag would effectively drive them out of business, which violates the intent of the Tester-Hagan provision.

 

2. Water Standards & Testing: FDA was directed by Congress to take a science- and risk-based approach to regulation, but the proposed requirements for irrigation water do not do so. Instead, the rules require that farmers' irrigation water meet the recreational water standard, but it makes no sense to require a farmer irrigating his or her crops to use water that would be safe for swimming. I urge the agency to make the following changes:

  • The FDA should not set a numeric standard until it has conducted a risk assessment specifically for water for agricultural purposes. 
  • The requirements for testing need to be clarified, including the options for when a farmer may test less frequently or use water that exceeds the standard. The current proposal, with its complex time delay algorithm, is extremely confusing and will inevitably lead to both higher costs and violations for farmers who simply can't figure out how to reasonably comply.
  • FDA should reduce the frequency of testing, requiring no more than 3 samples per growing season. As currently proposed, the testing frequencies are overly burdensome, lack scientific justification, and will impose significant costs on farmers.

3. Domestic Livestock: FDA should not treat grazing like manure application and should not restrict diversified farms through unrealistic intervals between grazing a field and harvest of a crop. The maximum waiting period should be 120 days, with an option for a shorter waiting period if steps are taken to prevent or detect contamination of the crop, including the use of hand harvesting.

 

4. Records and Recordkeeping Requirements: I urge the FDA to limit the recordkeeping requirements, particularly for farms that pack or hold produce from other farms, as follows:

  • Accept records kept in the ordinary course of business that reflect the immediate buyer and/or seller, such as an invoice;
  • Accept paper records, whether typed or handwritten (a requirement that records be kept electronically would be unnecessary, impose undue expense, and discriminate against those farmers who have no or limited access to technology);
  • Require that the records be kept for no more than one year.

5. Supplier Verification Program: FDA should remove the supplier verification program from the HARPC rule. At a minimum, FDA should remove the onsite audit requirement from the supplier verification program. The FDA should also remove the provision that qualified farms or facilities provide written assurances that they meet federal requirements. The supplier verification program effectively imposes an entire second layer of regulation on produce farms who are supplying ingredients to wholesalers and processors, an unnecessary burden that is not authorized by FSMA.

 

6. Environmental and Product Testing: These provisions vastly increase the cost of the proposed rule and will drive many businesses out of business without necessarily improving food safety. FDA should drop these provisions entirely.

 

Sincerely,

[Full name, city and state]

Keep Raw Milk Flowing

Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit, defends the rights and broadens the freedoms of family farms and artisan food producers while protecting consumer access to raw milk and nutrient-dense foods. Learn more About Us or check out the FTCLDF 2013 Summary.

 

Subscribe to Food Rights News RSS Feed, Visit us on Facebook or Follow us on Twitter!

 

             

          

Donations to the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund are always appreciated though not tax-deductible.  Prefer to make a tax-deductible donation? Contact us by email at [email protected] or call 703-208-FARM (3276).

Forward email

Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund | 8116 Arlington Blvd., Suite 263 | Falls Church | VA | 22042